[Land-and-Labor] What Australia could have learnt from Norway's sovereign wealth bonanza

[Lyle Allan]

Thanks Lev
I might not be able to come tomorrow night as a journalist is coming to
interview me on Wednesday and my place is a total mess and I need to clean
it up.
Lyle

-----Original Message-----
From: Land-and-Labor [mailto:land-and-labor-bounces at isocracy.org] On Behalf
Of Lev Lafayette
Sent: Monday, 12 September 2016 8:36 PM
To: land-and-labor at isocracy.org
Subject: [Land-and-Labor] What Australia could have learnt from Norway's
sovereign wealth bonanza

What Australia could have learnt from Norway's sovereign wealth bonanza

Had a little smart thinking been applied, Australia's biggest and longest
ride on the resources rollercoaster since the 1850s gold rush could have
been very beneficial indeed.

    It is about time that we recognised this reality by putting in place a
framework to ensure future generations will benefit from the extraction of
our finite mineral resources.

If federal and state governments had put a share of their windfall revenue
into a foreign currency future fund, thereby taking advantage of record-high
mineral prices and the soaring Australian dollar, they would have amassed a
tidy fortune.

Today, when converted back into local currency, this stockpile of wealth
would be worth much more than the capital outlaid, given that the Australian
dollar has naturally fallen in step with sliding mineral prices. These
savings could have been used to boost the economy after the mineral boom,
obviating the need for governments, and the nation, to go further into debt.

Instead, hundreds of billions of dollars in windfall government revenue have
been spectacularly squandered. Now, at the end of this feast-to-famine
feeding frenzy, there's no prospect of the federal government paying down
its $325 billion net debt, which is likely to continue rising for the rest
of the decade. Australia owes the world more than $1 trillion in net terms,
two and a half times the amount owed at the start of the boom.

Australia's lack of planning and foresight during this episode appears to
reflect our British heritage. Britain disastrously mismanaged its North Sea
oil bounty from the 1970s onwards, in sharp contrast to the measured,
controlled and long-term strategy adopted at the same time on the other side
of the North Sea in Norway. Australia's policy settings similarly fail to
register three fundamental truths about the resources industry-that
companies profit from extracting the minerals belonging to the Australian
people; that these resources are finite; and that price booms never last.

Australian governments, especially during boom times, have consistently
operated as though none of these factors apply. This approach has been
reinforced by economic advisers and media commentators. Treasury documents
released to me under the freedom of information law reveal that the
treasurer was advised by his department in June 2007 that the rise in
national income from the mining boom, then in its fourth year, could be
considered 'permanent'. Treasury then said this provided a 'strong case for
spending additional revenue'.

Influential economic commentators even chastised the treasury for having
failed to predict the mining boom, therefore denying Australians an even
bigger round of tax cuts. According to a treasury research paper, the Howard
government spent more than 90 per cent of a $334 billion revenue windfall in
its last three years in office-on tax cuts and middle-class welfare.

An astonishing lack of strategic thinking

Labor's planning was flawed too. In 2008 prime minister Kevin Rudd held his
2020 Summit. The summit was supposed to raise issues affecting our future
prosperity, yet policies to better manage the mining boom weren't mentioned
in the economic discussion led by the treasurer, or in the 400-page report
that followed. The lack of strategic thinking is astonishing, especially
when compared with the considered analysis and long-term planning that
prevailed at the start of Norway's oil boom.

The Labor government did try to introduce a super-profits tax in 2010, which
treasury sources said could have raised $100 billion over a decade.
This income was not earmarked for a sovereign wealth fund, but would at
least have delivered more of the profit to the nation, rather than to the
mostly foreign-owned mining corporations.

However, the design of the tax was overly complex and its hasty introduction
allowed the mining companies to ambush the government. In what must be one
of the most comprehensive policy defeats since Federation, the miners
knocked off the prime minister and then killed the tax, thanks in part to an
advertising blitz costing a mere $22 million.

Research commissioned by Big Dirt showed that the ads' rhetoric convinced
the Australian people that the nation's prosperity was dependent on its
lightly taxed mining sector. (Stock-exchange data indicates that the
effective tax rate on the resources sector is around 30 per cent, less than
half Norway's rate, and lower even than that of some emerging
economies.)

What we can learn from Norway

There are two key lessons for Australia from the story of Norwegian oil.
First, the government should revisit the super-profits tax, so that the
nation benefits the next time mineral prices surge. In order to head off the
political opportunists, the government must properly explain the need for
this tax, and perhaps package it with reform of imposts such as stamp duty
and royalties that are legacies of our colonial past.

Even though China's demand for coal and iron ore may have peaked, India is
likely to sustain demand for these key commodities for many years to come.
A period of low commodity prices provides an opportunity to introduce such a
reform, notwithstanding the likely backlash from a diminished mining
industry.

Second, this revenue should be channelled into a foreign currency fund to
hedge against the next commodity downturn.

The really big lesson from Norway is not the size of its trillion-dollar
fund; it is the way every single krone of surplus revenue has been converted
into foreign currency. Norway has a commodity-based economy like
Australia's, but it has built a giant hedge to help manage the boom times
and protect against the inevitable periods of subdued commodity prices.
This explains why Norway is a creditor nation that has almost doubled its
net foreign assets to around 185 per cent of GDP since 2010. That is the
equivalent of Australia having amassed net foreign assets worth $3 trillion;
instead, we owe the world $1 trillion.

Neither the Australian government nor its private sector seems to understand
the long-term benefit of building up a hedge against mineral downturns. Our
much-vaunted $1.3 trillion in superannuation savings is massively
over-invested in domestic assets, with only 30 per cent invested offshore.
This industry, which has a guaranteed revenue stream as a result of
government policy, failed to take advantage of the high Australian dollar as
it surged above its long-term average of US70c and indeed went above $US1 at
the height of the boom.

Had these investment managers lifted their foreign currency allocation in
step with the rising Australian dollar, the superannuation savings of all
Australians would potentially be worth hundreds of billions of dollars more
than they are today, and the financial pressure on retirees and government
would be commensurately lower.

For most of our history, Australia has been dependent on the prices obtained
from shipments of bulk commodities to earn export income. It is about time
that we recognised this reality by putting in place a framework to ensure
future generations will benefit from the extraction of our finite mineral
resources.

This is extract from Paul Cleary's Trillion Dollar Baby-How Norway Beat the
Oil Giants and Won a Lasting Fortune, published by Black Inc. and Biteback.


http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/what-australia-co
uld-have-learnt-from-norway-sovereign-wealth/7797560

--
Lev Lafayette, BA (Hons), GradCertTerAdEd (Murdoch), GradCertPM, MBA (Tech
Mngmnt) (Chifley)
mobile:  0432 255 208
RFC 1855 Netiquette Guidelines
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
For liberty and commonwealth http://isocracy.org


_______________________________________________
Land-and-Labor mailing list
Land-and-Labor at isocracy.org
http://mail.isocracy.org/mailman/listinfo/land-and-labor_isocracy.org


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus